Thursday, 27 September 2012
11
Google Penguin Updated, What Do we Do Now?
If you were observant, you
would have noticed what the picture of this post portray. You can see how ready
the robots are to hurt any web spamming or over optimization.
Recently, Google updated the penguin/panda
to hunt down websites that spam to gain search engine recognition. In fact, the
latest update was made to hunt over optimization. The question then comes in “What
do I do now?”. Well, the truth is you can’t spam or buy your way to the top no
more. Keyword stuffing, excessive use of heading and subheading tags,
aggressive link building and the likes will hurt your rankings with no mercy.
During the penguin update, Matt
Cutt stated, “We don’t need to bother much about keyword phrases as we have
integrated a system to do a lot of synonym work so that we can find good pages
that don’t happen to use the same words as the user typed.”
“A lot of People do too much [i.e.
excessive use of meta tags and headings that are keyword dense] to the extent
that we regard it as keyword stuffing, and it hurts. I just want to ensure you
do it in normal ways where regular people aren’t going to find it stiff or
artificial. That tends to be what works best.”
You can watch this video to see
how Matt Cutt explains how search engine robots crawl webpages to fish out search query ~
If you were smart, you’d have
noticed that what this means is that many of the search
engine optimization tips we find online are now outdated. Even a site as
big as WPMU.org (which was formally a PR7 site) was hit by the recent penguin update.
So if a site as big as this could make SEO mistakes, we really need to pay
attention to these updates to feel safe from these deadly robots? The question then
arises, “How then can one promote a website without being labeled spam”. Well,
gone are the days where you use keyword density in headings, images, and links
as they would now be considered spamming in the eyes of Google. You will have to work smarter now to gain any
link juice. This simply means that;
1.
You don’t need to concentrate too much on
certain keywords. Playing around related or synonymous terms is the new thing
but should be done with care to avoid spamming and keyword stuffing.
2.
Do not build links aggressively as you may loose
your traffic and pagerank. I would suggest registering to use the GoogleAnalytic to monitor your site’s progress.
3.
Another way to getting more search engine
recognition is to give more attention to Google+. It was also made mention of during
the update that henceforth, popular posts from Google+ social network would be
given good search preferences in search results. As we all know, the big G owns G+ and there’s
nothing better than making the best use of it.
Although, I do not more so much
about using G+, but here’s an answer I gave to a friend who once asked me about
the social media site and the reply I gave. I think it may be of use;
My
friend said: What do you think about this G+ of a thing and
how do you think it will affect other social networks?
I
replied: Well, I’m yet to learn the techniques to using it. G+ has a
lot of registered users but I still hear a lot of people lay complains as to
not knowing how to use the platform. It is a very powerful tool and for the
fact that it’s owned by Google, it shall command respect. Since it's still a bit new to many, we need time to master its tools. From what I see, this
social media site was born to overtake the popular Facebook and Twitter and we
can tell that from the recent drop in Facebook’s page rank and the increasing number of inactive users.
My
friend said: So, what then should we do?
I
replied: Just like a driver driving his passengers in a bus, we just have to
follow to his destination. That does not mean that we should abandon other social
media networks but we have to give this G+ of a thing some good consideration
and respect. From what I can conclude, getting more interactions to your page
and posts on G+ would do so much good for your site too. I think people and
businesses should start to embrace Google+ early and start building their
network. The earlier the better.
In conclusion, we should all
note that there are no smart ways to gaining link and dominating the search
engine for now. You have to gradually build link and use keywords wisely.
I do hope we find the game
going smooth in this post penguin era.
To your success.
You may also like
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
About Me
- Ivan Aliku
- I am a passionate blogger, affiliate and web developer living in Abuja, Nigeria. I'm the owner and content moderator of http://bloggers-club.com/. I love to share ideas about SEO, social media, writing and ways to generate income on my blog. You can also find my blog on Twitter, Facebook, Google+
and Pinterest










11 Responses to “Google Penguin Updated, What Do we Do Now?”
27 September 2012 16:36
This is a great article. What would you consider to be excessive use of keywords?? Google+ is interesting, although i feel it is hard to build a follow base here. But, it looks like the way we need to go...and go there we must!
28 September 2012 01:22
There is no need to worry for those who are following google guidelines and working using White hat techniques, These updates are strictly for spammers.
Melbourne Search Engine Optimisation
28 September 2012 01:22
Hi, Ivan.
Thanks for this update.
Since I am one of the victims of the latest Penguin updates, I will have to use the information on your post to update some of my posts.
Seems to me that I was too aggressive in stuffing the ALT tags of my images with keywords.
28 September 2012 04:48
@Catherine: Don't be scared. Just do it natural by not over using the header and sub header tags. A lot of people spam with it. Also, ensure your keyword choice don't appear more than 15% within the body of your post.
@Melbourne: Sure. But who knows what Google sees as spam in your site? Like I pointed out, WPMU.org is a reputable site but they got hit. Who then is safe if you don't watch your optimization techniques?
@Augis: I'm sorry you got hit by the penguin update. Just start to build those links naturally and keep your content clear from using excessive keywords.
Thankl you all for commenting.
29 September 2012 12:45
Ivan, 15% is not the right figure!
The limit has been lowered all the time.
I think that currently anything above 4.5% will be regarded by Google as over-optimization.
And it makes sense.
Take the shortest length of post recommended by Google. 300 words. 15% would mean that among 300 words 45 would be keyword??
29 September 2012 15:33
Thank you for pointing that out. I was actually trying to make reference to the keyword choice not appearing more than 6-8 times within the post. That is, if you were writing a post on Facebook, the word "Facebook" should not appear more than 8 times in the body of a post of over 300 words. I made a wrong calculation. Thank you once again for doing the mathematics.
30 September 2012 07:59
I'm still so new to trying to figure this stuff out, and how it all could apply to my site, which technically doesn't have a niche, that this new information to assimilate is a bit crazy. There's nothing quite like trying to apply the math of it all to simple posts.
And on the G+ issue, its still a hard sell. I know that Google commands respect and all, but they are starting to slip up. G+ falls short of the mark because its trying to stand alone, for things to survive on the Internet they all have to integrate. Facebook has branched out and integrated with twitter, and how many picture websites, and so forth. While G+ is resisting trying to integrate with anything that's not a Google brand.
Then take into account they are trying to take on Apple, in the dumbest way possible. The androids copying the iPhone shines a light on what is wrong with G+, that its just a copy of Facebook with switched around features that don't really work. Until Google starts realizing that internet is all about sharing and integrating, G+ will be a consistent failure. They are holding on to it, because Google, and many other feel, that eventually Facebook will make a big enough mistake for people to make a mass exodus, and when they do, G+ will be there to catch them.
Should we ignore G+? Nope, but we also have to realize it operates as a copy that has its own rules, and learning them will be tough. In the end, we just have to add it to our list of social networking platforms we have to work in mass.
30 September 2012 08:24
Nicely pointed out Dan. I had spent the whole of today trying to search for ways to integrate G+ with other social media but all those hours were effortless as it yielded no result. But all the same, we just have to accept G+ as more preference would to be given to it in Google search engine than other media sites. Thanks for your contribution.
30 September 2012 10:18
Hey Ivan,
This is really good information. I have read that over using anchor text can hurt with google in accordance with their new updates.
Thanks for sharing!
San Diego Car Detailing
13 December 2012 21:06
While this subject can be very touchy for most people, my opinion is that there has to be a middle or common ground that we all can find. I do appreciate that youve added relevant and intelligent commentary here though. Thank you!
My page : airconboys aircon Servicing
16 December 2012 23:14
Thanks for your comment airconboys. Staying peguin safe can be achieved using keywords that are synonymous. People need to avoid stressing much on heavy keywords.
Post a Comment
We love comments but we don't like spamming. Please, share something reasonable.